11 comments

I have always failed to understand why anyone would (a) listen and (b) pay so called ‘analysts’. Going to a gypsy fortune teller on the local festival has as much predictive value. Come on, can we please stop this no-news?

Martijn, on November 25th, 2008 at 10:59 am

i should have been an analyst. must be nice to be wrong 98% of the time and not get fired.

Firesign, on November 25th, 2008 at 11:08 am

I’m not sure where to really post this, but you guys really need to work on all the Flash/Java/Javascript that is bogging down your site. I enjoy reading it, but lately I’ve been put off by the abysmal load times as the piles of Java eat up my time.

r2, on November 25th, 2008 at 11:15 am

I disagree with the idea that Apple should market a netbook at all, to the point of outlining and explaining my views in this article.

http://coreminimalist.blogspot.com/2008/10/netbooks-are-not-apples-design.html

Dann, on November 25th, 2008 at 1:05 pm

This is where so many people are wrong. What Apple should do is double the width of the iPod so that the screen is twice as big. I would buy that for $400 or $500 dollars. Don’t do anything else with it. Just double it in size and have everything else exactly the same. I think it would be a huge seller.

OlsonBW, on November 25th, 2008 at 3:56 pm

I’m with Firesign - I wonder often about the motivation of many analysts to make the statements they make, and the PR machine behind each one. Usually it’s the analysts with the most effective PR campaigns that actually get heard, whether their suppositions make sense or not. Sometimes it’s about who can circulate the most press releases.

That being said however, I don’t think Apple’s about to introduce a netbook by any stretch. Hell, they essentially have one already, and it’s called the iPod Touch. Want cellular net access? It’s called the iPhone.

In any event, I think it’s not very prudent to complain about the source of the article - analysts will say lots of things. But what do WE, the Cult, think? Posts like this keep us talking about - at the very least - why analysts are idiots and netbooks aren’t in Apple’s business profile and why they shouldn’t (or should?) be.

phoenix, on November 25th, 2008 at 6:49 pm

I’d like “Self-Promotional Stabs In the Dark” for $800 please Alex.

imajoebob, on November 25th, 2008 at 8:30 pm

Gene Munster was the first analyst to “get” that the iPod was going to he a huge success, and he’s been the most accurate historically, leaving his peers at Merrill and other analyst firms in the dust. He’s worth your time.

Frank Cioffi, on November 25th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

A sub $199 iPhone without 3G or GPS would be a terrible move by Apple. Perhaps Gene is in danger of forgetting that markets beyond US shores not only exist, but are essential to a product’s success, especially in economically depressed times. Overseas, 3G is virtually standard (Europe, Asia) — a 2G phone would run the risk of being drastically inferior to the bulk of handsets on the market.

Albert, on November 26th, 2008 at 1:56 am

Piper’s been hyping this $800 price point since before the Sept. “Let’s Rock” event. I’ve yet to see any evidence to suggest that it’s based on any reality, and yet “reputable” news publications keep printing it.

So does Wired.

Darcy McGee, on November 27th, 2008 at 9:18 pm

I agree that “NetBook” may not be the way to go for Apple in fear of changing the way they are perceived.

However, perhaps:
1) tablet may work. Not a low end netbook.
2) docking station for the iPhone to give it a larger screen and keyboard (like folio but integrated into one).

Bill, on November 29th, 2008 at 4:32 am