Only Google treats us as well as this. Other software developers insist on adding functionality to their updates; only Google gives us the benefit of enhanced version numbers. These people really care about us. It brings a tear to my eye, it really does.
Newsletters
Daily round-ups or a weekly refresher, straight from Cult of Mac to your inbox.
-
The Weekender
The week's best Apple news, reviews and how-tos from Cult of Mac, every Saturday morning. Our readers say: "Thank you guys for always posting cool stuff" -- Vaughn Nevins. "Very informative" -- Kenly Xavier.
Popular This Week
- How to use iPhone’s awesome new text-to-speech feature
- Crank up Safari’s privacy to the max
- Hackers can exploit flaw in Apple M-series processors
- Everything you can do to get the latest AirTag firmware update
- iMac vs. MacBook: Should you buy a desktop or laptop Mac?
- Apple patches iPhone bugs with new iOS update
- Smackdown: Magic Mouse vs. Logitech MX Master 3 [Setups]
- Good news for AirPods, bad news for Apple [The CultCast]
- Concept video shows gorgeous iPad Pro we hope is coming soon
- iPhones go for as little as $126 in refurb blowout
14 responses to “Google Mobile App Upgrade Adds Essential Version Number Enhancement”
Really? Where’d you find this one?
Oooo! If I had to provide one adjective to that version number, it would most definitely be “enhanced”!
I always thought the old version number was insufficient. You really need three numerals after the second decimal for optimal granularity…
Cleve: believe it or not, I found it on my iPhone, via a tip-off from a friend on IRC. Now I know that you posted on it too, I’ll cheerfully send all the scoop-whuffie to you :)
Dude. You have 8 updates ??? Hmmm bizarrrrrre
Obviously you do not know googles hints of sarcasm. Wow.
Try calling 1800GOOG411, and as it loads your request the automated waiting sound is a guy babbling in your ear.
Our world is too serious these days.
(and if you do not see the irony in my stating that statement the world is truly gone.)
(as well as the last statement about the previous statement)
And I thought they were somewhat smart… :P